The Philosophy of Semar as an Ethical Framework for the Use of Artificial Intelligence
Mohamad Khusnial Muhtar
1
, Naufal Robbiqis Dwi Asta
2
1
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2
UIN Sunan Ampel, Surabaya, Indonesia
mohamadkhusnialmuhtar@mail.ugm.ac.id
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a multidimensional phenomenon that profoundly impacts various aspects of modern human life. While global discussions on AI ethics have predominantly centered on Western perspectives, this study explores ethical AI development through the lens of Semar philosophy, representing the local wisdom of Nusantara. Employing library research with a philosophical approach, this research analyzes some sources on Semar philosophy and its relevance to AI ethics. The findings reveal that: 1) The Ojo Dumeh principle promotes humility in AI use and development, preventing technological arrogance and misuse. The Eling principle emphasizes awareness of AI’s intended purpose and its socio-environmental consequences, fostering responsible innovation. The Waspada principle highlights the importance of risk mitigation, addressing challenges such as algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, and unequal access to technology. 2) The integration of these ethical values presents an opportunity for strategic collaboration among developers, users, and policymakers to craft regulations that harmonize global standards with local wisdom, reinforcing the importance of culture-based ethics education. 3) Key challenges in implementation include limited cultural awareness in AI ethics discourse, resource constraints, and difficulties in aligning local ethical values with global regulatory frameworks. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on AI ethics by introducing a localized ethical framework that balances technological advancements with cultural values. Further research is recommended to develop a structured implementation framework and an adaptive strategy for global integration, ensuring that local philosophical perspectives contribute to a more humane, inclusive, and ethically responsible AI ecosystem
Keywords
artificial intelligence, ethical framework, philosophy of Semar
References
Akter, S. (2024). Global Perspectives on the Social Impacts of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Review of Regional Inequalities and Cultural Contexts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science, 5(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.60087
Albaar, R. (2018). Laku Pancawisaya: Ajaran Tokoh Wayang Semar dalam Mereduksi Krisis. Hisbah: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Dan Dakwah Islam, 15(1), 57–67. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14421/hisbah.2018.151-05
Bakker, A., & Zubair, A. C. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Beijing AI Principles (Vol. 10). Beijing: Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence.
Bhilawa, L. (2024). Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor dari Sudut Pandang Filsafat Jawa “Ojo Dumeh, Eling lan Waspodo”. Akuntansi : Jurnal Akuntansi Integratif, 10(1), 45–54. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.29080/jai.v10i1.1559
European Commission: Directorate-General for Communications Networks, C. and T. (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi/10.2759/346720
Harjanto, N. S., & Najicha, F. U. (2024). Pendidikan Pancasila Sebagai Kerangka Etika Dalam Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (JPIPS), 2024(16), 30–37. Retrieved from http://e-journal.upr.ac.id/index.php/JP-IPS
Haryoko, S., Bahartiar, & Arwadi, F. (2020). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif (Konsep, Teknik, & Prosedur Analisis). Makassar: Badan Penerbit Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., & Woodside, T. (2023). An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks. ArXiv:2306.12001. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.12001
Kresna, A. (2022). Dunia Semar. Yogyakarta: Laksana.
Nadlir, N. (2016). Urgensi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education Studies), 2(2), 299–330
Pranowo, P. (2020). Local Wisdom as a Local Context toward a Global Context to Interpret Pragmatic Meaning: A Case Study of Javanese Language. Salingka, 17(2), 113–125.
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence A Modern Approach. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Sari, A., Dahlan, Tuhumury, R. A. N., Prayitno, Y., Siegers, W. H., Supiyanto, & Werdhani, A. S. (2023). Dasardasar Metodologi Penelitian. Jayapura: CV. Angkasa Pelangi.Singapore Empowering Possibilities, Infocomm Media Development Authority, & Personal Data Protection
Comission of Singapore. (2020). Model Artificial Intelligence Government Framework. Singapore: Infocomm Media Development Authority.
UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/open-United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Comissioner. (2023). Taxonomy of Human Rights Risks Connected to Generative AI Supplement to B-Tech’s Foundational Paper on the Responsible Development and Deployment of Generative AI. Palais Wilson: United Nations Human Rights.
Vold, K., & Harris, D. R. (2023). How Does Artificial Intelligence Pose an Existential Risk? In C. Véliz (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics. Oxford: Oxford Academic.
2 UIN Sunan Ampel, Surabaya, Indonesia
mohamadkhusnialmuhtar@mail.ugm.ac.id
Abstract
Keywords
artificial intelligence, ethical framework, philosophy of SemarReferences
Akter, S. (2024). Global Perspectives on the Social Impacts of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Review of Regional Inequalities and Cultural Contexts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science, 5(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.60087
Albaar, R. (2018). Laku Pancawisaya: Ajaran Tokoh Wayang Semar dalam Mereduksi Krisis. Hisbah: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Dan Dakwah Islam, 15(1), 57–67. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14421/hisbah.2018.151-05
Bakker, A., & Zubair, A. C. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Beijing AI Principles (Vol. 10). Beijing: Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence.
Bhilawa, L. (2024). Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor dari Sudut Pandang Filsafat Jawa “Ojo Dumeh, Eling lan Waspodo”. Akuntansi : Jurnal Akuntansi Integratif, 10(1), 45–54. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.29080/jai.v10i1.1559
European Commission: Directorate-General for Communications Networks, C. and T. (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi/10.2759/346720
Harjanto, N. S., & Najicha, F. U. (2024). Pendidikan Pancasila Sebagai Kerangka Etika Dalam Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (JPIPS), 2024(16), 30–37. Retrieved from http://e-journal.upr.ac.id/index.php/JP-IPS
Haryoko, S., Bahartiar, & Arwadi, F. (2020). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif (Konsep, Teknik, & Prosedur Analisis). Makassar: Badan Penerbit Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., & Woodside, T. (2023). An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks. ArXiv:2306.12001. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.12001
Kresna, A. (2022). Dunia Semar. Yogyakarta: Laksana.
Nadlir, N. (2016). Urgensi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education Studies), 2(2), 299–330
Pranowo, P. (2020). Local Wisdom as a Local Context toward a Global Context to Interpret Pragmatic Meaning: A Case Study of Javanese Language. Salingka, 17(2), 113–125.
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence A Modern Approach. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Sari, A., Dahlan, Tuhumury, R. A. N., Prayitno, Y., Siegers, W. H., Supiyanto, & Werdhani, A. S. (2023). Dasardasar Metodologi Penelitian. Jayapura: CV. Angkasa Pelangi.Singapore Empowering Possibilities, Infocomm Media Development Authority, & Personal Data Protection
Comission of Singapore. (2020). Model Artificial Intelligence Government Framework. Singapore: Infocomm Media Development Authority.
UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/open-United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Comissioner. (2023). Taxonomy of Human Rights Risks Connected to Generative AI Supplement to B-Tech’s Foundational Paper on the Responsible Development and Deployment of Generative AI. Palais Wilson: United Nations Human Rights.
Vold, K., & Harris, D. R. (2023). How Does Artificial Intelligence Pose an Existential Risk? In C. Véliz (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics. Oxford: Oxford Academic.
