Geophilosophy, For What?

Rangga Kala Mahaswa
Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Centre for Anthropocene Studies and Geophilosophy, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
mahaswa@ugm.ac.id

Abstract

Geo-philosophy, born from the fusion of “geo” and “philosophy,” bears a productive ambiguity: spanning geography, geology, and something even more expansive: a super-massive, unclassifiable rhizome. It invites us to untangle the entwinement of human and non-human life, confronting the wreckage of modernity’s legacy. The Enlightenment’s blind optimism birthed the myth of human exceptionalism—a myth that now teeters on the brink of planetary collapse. In this delusional world, the messiah complex thrives, embodied by billionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, whose fantasies of off-world salvation mask the ongoing commodification and destruction of Earth. This is called as geo-fetishism, and masquerading as hope: the heroic gesture of saving the world while devouring it. As we descend deeper into the Dark Anthropocene, the human merges with the non-human in uncanny proximity, dissolving boundaries and unsettling species hierarchies. Also, posthumanism arises not as liberation, but as a symptom of collapse, blurring the borders of world-systems and natural kinds amid thickening ecological dread. Here, geo-philosophy reveals its radical edge, yet also its tragic limitation. It speaks not to the triumphant, but to the defeated, to those who live in the ruins, haunted by extinction, carrying the crisis of being like a wound. In this "wonderful" ruin of a world, I challenge geo-philosophy, for whom, and for what? Unfortunately, it is limited only for the oppressed, the defeated, the marginalized beings. Only they can grasp its “essence”—those haunted by death, who carry the crisis of existence like a love-hate companion. It is for the lost, whose struggle is etched into the very bones of the Earth, enduring until their final breath, in the name of extinction nihilism.

Keywords

geophilosophy, dark anthropocene, extinction nihilism, dead labour

References

Bashford, A., Kern, E. M., & Bobbette, A. (Eds.) (with Chakrabarty, D.). (2023). New earth histories: Geo-cos￾mologies and the making of the modern world. The University of Chicago Press.

Bobbette, A., & Donovan, A. (Eds.). (2019). Political Geology: Active Stratigraphies and the Making of Life. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98189-5

Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity press.

Chandler, D. (2019). The transvaluation of critique in the Anthropocene. Global Society, 33(1), 26-44.

Chernilo, D. (2017). The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(1), 44–60.

Clark, N., & Szerszynski, B. (2020). Planetary social thought: The anthropocene challenge to the social sciences. Polity Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? Columbia Univ. Pr.

Ejsing, M. (2023). The arrival of the Anthropocene in social theory: From modernism and Marxism towards a new materialism. The Sociological Review, 71(1), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221106905

Hamilton, C. (2015). Human destiny in the Anthropocene. In The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis (pp. 32–43). Routledge.

Hamilton, C. (2020). Towards a fifth ontology for the Anthropocene. Angelaki, 25(4), 110–119.

Heikkurinen, P., Rinkinen, J., Järvensivu, T., Wilén, K., & Ruuska, T. (2016). Organising in the Anthropocene: An ontological outline for ecocentric theorising. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.016

Heringman, N. (2015). Deep Time at the Dawn of the Anthropocene. Representations, 129(1), 56–85.

Hoelle, J., & Kawa, N. C. (2021). Placing the Anthropos in Anthropocene. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(3), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1842171

Kallhoff, A., & Liedauer, E. (Eds.). (2024). Greentopia: Utopian Thought in the Anthropocene (Vol. 36). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56802-2

Kawa, N. C. (2016). Amazonia in the Anthropocene: People, Soils, Plants, Forests. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/307991

Knuuttila, T. (2014). Scientific Representation, Reflexivity, and the Possibility of Constructive Realism. In M. C. Galavotti, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, & M. Weber (Eds.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 297–312). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04382-1_20

Mahaswa, R. K., & Purbandani, A. M. (2023). The pluriverse of the Anthropocene: One Earth, many worlds. Cat￾alan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 15(2), 269-284.

Mahaswa, R. K., Gebbyano, N., & Hardiyanti (2025). Bioinspired technology and the uncanny Anthropocene. Technology in Society, 81, 102801.

Nail, T. (2021). Theory of the Earth. Stanford University Press

Pugh, J., & Chandler, D. (2023). The World as abyss: The Caribbean and critical thought in the anthropocene. University of Westminster Press.

Raffnsøe, S. (2016). Philosophy of the anthropocene: The human turn. Palgrave Macmillan.

Rueda, D. (2022). The Anthropocene as a historical hyperobject. Rethinking History, 26(3), 371–391.

Sheller, M. (2020). Island Futures: Caribbean Survival in the Anthropocene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478012733

Simarmata, H. A., Rafliana, I., Herbeck, J., & Siriwardane-de Zoysa, R. (2023). Futuring ‘Nusantara’: Detangling Indonesia’s Modernist Archipelagic Imaginaries. In S. Partelow, M. Hadjimichael, & A.-K. Hornidge (Eds.), Ocean Governance (Vol. 25, pp. 337–363). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20740-2_15

Stephens, M. S. M., & Martínez-San Miguel, Y. (2020). Contemporary archipelagic thinking: Toward new com￾parative methodologies and disciplinary formations. Rowman & Littlefield.

Szerszynski, B. (2012). The end of the end of nature: The Anthropocene and the fate of the human. Oxford Literary Review, 34(2), 165–184.

Thomas, J. A., Williams, M., & Zalasiewicz, J. (2020). The anthropocene: A multidisciplinary approach. Polity.

Toadvine, T. (2024). The memory of the world: deep time, animality, and eschatology (Vol. 70). U of Minnesota Press.

Vivaldi, J. (2021). Xenological subjectivity: Rosi Braidotti and object-oriented ontology. Open Philosophy, 4(1), 311–334.

Wilmer, S. E., & Žukauskaitė, A. (Eds.). (2023). Life in the posthuman condition: Critical responses to the an￾thropocene. Edinburgh University Press.

Witze, A. (2024). Geologists reject the Anthropocene as Earth’s new epoch—After 15 years of debate. Nature, 627(8003), 249–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00675-8

Woodard, B. (2013). On an Ungrounded Earth: Towards a new geophilosophy. Punctum Books.

Yusoff, K. (2017). Geosocial Strata. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2–3), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416688543

Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Williams, M., & Summerhayes, C. P. (Eds.). (2019). The Anthropocene as a Geo￾logical Time Unit: A Guide to the Scientific Evidence and Current Debate (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108621359

Volume 12, 06 Aug 2025
Article metrics
  • 19 views
  • 18 downloads